Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6]) by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.2/8.8.0) with ESMTP id BAA29271 for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 01:02:53 +0100
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 24590]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <15805-364>; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 03:02:39 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971109-8840>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 19:58:10 -0400
Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk ([158.152.220.239] HELO kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 2481]) by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id <971107-8839>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 19:57:53 -0400
Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org [::ffff:127.0.0.1]
by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 1.62 #2)
id 0wrAyi-0006F4-00; Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:37:56 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: rmk92@ecs.soton.ac.uk
cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Any more feedback on ARM Linux?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Jul 1997 23:48:43 BST."
>> I think your mailer is putting a broken From address in, which may not help.
>..
>
>I've tried the RedHat version of Elm, my own version of Elm, but I can't get
>anything to give me a correct From: line.
My solution for this is to let my MUA put in what it likes (which is easier than convincing all the different programs that can send mail to get it right) and have the MTA (Exim in my case) rewrite my headers. I imagine you can do this with sendmail, but I'm not sure how.